¶ð¤s¦ÛµM¹êÅç«Ç

TNL.org.tw

°ê¥ß»OÆW¤j¾Ç´Óª«¾Ç¬ã¨s©ÒºÓ¤h¾Ç¦ì½×¤å

ÃD¡@¡@¥Ø¡G «n¤¯¤s°Ï¨È¼ö±a§C¦a«BªL¾ðºØ²Õ¦¨¡Bµ²ºc¤Î¤À¥¬Ãþ«¬¡]Woody Floristic Composition, Structure and Distrbution Pattern of Subtropical Lowland Rain Forest at Nanjen Lake¡^
§@¡@¡@ªÌ¡G ­S¯ÀÞ³¡]R86226003¡^
«ü¾É±Ð±Â¡G Áªø´I³Õ¤h
¤f¸Õ©e­û¡G ÀR©y¤j¾Ç³qÃѤ¤¤ß ¡@·¨°êºÕ³Õ¤h
ªF®ü¥Íª«¬ã¨s©Ò¡@®]¸q¤è³Õ¤h
ªL·~¸ÕÅç©Ò¥Íª«¨t ¼ï´I«T³Õ¤h
«Ì§Þ´ËªL¸ê·½§Þ³N¨t¡@³¢Ä£ºú³Õ¤h
»O¤j´Óª«¬ã¨s©Ò¡@Áªø´I³Õ¤h
¤é¡@¡@´Á¡G ¤¤µØ¥Á°ê¤K¤Q¤K¦~¤»¤ë

ºK­n


©ó«n¤s¸ô3.3Kªñ«n¤¯´ò³B³]¥ß¤@¾î¸ó¯ó¿A¤Î´ËªL¤§¨â¤½³¼¼Ë°Ï¡]¥]²[´ËªL­±¿n1.69¤½³¼¡B¯ó¿A¦a0.31¤½³¼¡^¡A©ó1998¦~´»°²§¹¦¨°ò¥»¸ê®Æªºªì¨B¦¬¶°¡C¥Øªº´£¨Ñ¤@­Ó¶i¦æ¨ä¥L¬ã¨s¦p¤À¸Ñ¡]decomposition¡^¡B­ä¸¨ª«¡]litterfall¡^¡BÀç¾iÆQ´`Àô¡]nutrient cycle¡^¡B­¹ª«Ãìµ¥¥ÍºA¬ã¨s°ò¥»¸ê®Æ¡C

¶i¦æ¯Ý°ªª½®|dbh¤j©ó1cm¤§¤ì¥»´Óª«½Õ¬d¡A¦@µo²{43¬ì81ÄÝ119ºØ¤ì¥»´Óª«¡C´Ó®è±K«×¨C¤½³¼°ª¹F11025´Ê¡AÁ`©³­±¿n¬°¨C¤½³¼45.05¥­¤è¤½¤Ø¡C¦U¾ðºØÀu¶Õ±¡§Î¡A³ì¤ìÃþ´Óª«¥H¬õªá¤K¨¤¡]Illicium arborescens¡^¡Bªø§ÀÑÜ¡]Castanopsis calesii¡^¡B­²¸­¥V«C¡]Ilex cochinchiensis¡^¡B¦¿¬Y¡]Schefflera octophylla¡^¡B´ä¤f¤ì²ü¡]Schima superba var. kankoensis¡^¡B¬P¨ëÑÜ¡]Castanopsis stellato-spina¡^¡B¯Q¨Ó¥V«C¡]Ilex uraiensis¡^¡BÀ@ªGòR¡]Cyclobalanopsis longinux¡^¡B¶ø¤óªê¥Ö·£¡]Daphniphyllum glaucescens ssp. oldhamii¡^¡B¾U¯ß¤ìÁ¤¤l¡]Litsea acutivena¡^¡B§ö¸­¥ÛòR¡]Lithocarpus amygdalifolius¡^¡Bù׸­³¥¨d¤¦¡]Astronia formosana¡^¬°«e12Àu¶ÕºØ¡C¦bªL¤UÄé¤ì´Óª«­«­n­È°ª©ó1ªº¦³¡G¤E¸`¤ì¡]Psychotria rubra¡^¡B³¥¨d¤¦¡]Melastoma candidum¡^¡B®ç¸­¬À·ä¡]Aucuba chinensis¡^¡B«n¤¯¤­¤ë¯ù¡]Antidesma hiiranensis¡^¡C´ËªL¥D­n¬°´ß¤æ¬ì¡]Fagaceae¡^¡B¤K¨¤¯õ­»¬ì¡]Illiciaceae¡^¡B¥V«C¬ì¡]Aquifoliaceae¡^¡B¼Ì¬ì¡]Lauraceae¡^¤Î¯ù¬ì¡]Theaceae¡^©Ò²Õ¦¨¡C

·í¦a´ËªLªL«a°ª«×Åܤƻá¤j¡A¾ð«a°ª«×¥i±q4¤½¤Ø¤W¤É¦Ü18¤½¤Ø¡A­I­··Ë¨¦³B³Ì°ª¡A¶V©¹¸W½u¾ð«a°ª«×¶V§C¡C´ËªL««ª½¤À¼hªº²{¶H¦b¸W½u¤×¨ä¤£©úÅã¡C

±N¦UºØÃþ¨Ì¤£¦P®|¯Å¤Á¤À»P®è¼Æ§@¹Ï±o¨ì¤§®|¯Åµ²ºc¹Ï¡A¥i¤À¬°¤TºØÃþ«¬¡A¤ÏJ«¬¡]42ºØ¡^¡BL«¬¡]38ºØ¡^¡Bªi°Ê«¬¡]9ºØ¡^¡AÅã¥Ü¼Ë°Ï¤¤ªº¦U¾ðºØ§¡§e²{Â×´I¤p¾ð®w¡]Sapling bank¡^¡Aªí¥Ü²{¦sªººØÃþ¦³¨}¦nªº§ó·sª¬ºA¡C

±N½Õ¬d¸ê®Æ¸gÂù¦V¦Cªí¤ÀªRªk¡]TWINSPAN¡^¶i¦æ´Ó¸s¤ÀÃþ«á¡A¦A±N´Óª«ªÀ·|»P¦a§Î¹Ï·f°t«á¡Aµo²{´Óª«ªÀ·|»P¦a§Î±K¤Á°t¦X¡C¦bTWINSPAN²Ä¤@¦¸¤G¤À®É¥i±N¼Ë°Ï¤Á¤À¬°¤s©Y©Î·Ë¨¦¤À¬°¨â¤j¸s¡A²Ä¤G¦¸®É¤S±N¤s©Y«¬¤À¬°¨â­Ó¨È¸s¡G¸W¯á«¬»P©Y­±«¬¡A·Ë¨¦«¬°Ï¤À¬°¨â­Ó¨È¸s¡G·Ë¯`«¬¤Î¨¦¦a«¬¡CÀu¶Õ¬ìªº²Õ¦¨¥Ñ¸W¯á¤§´ß¤æ¬ì¡B¤K¨¤¯õ­»¬ì¡B¯ù¬ì¡B¥V«C¬ì¡B¼Ì¬ì¡AÂàÅܬ°·Ë¨¦ªºÓ}¯ó¬ì¡]Rubiaceae¡^¡B¤­¥[¬ì¡]Araliaceae¡^¡B¼Ì¬ì¡B´ß¤æ¬ì¡B¬Ùªfªo¬ì¡]Staphyleaceae¡^¡C±K«×¤]¥Ñ¸W¯á¦V·Ë¨¦­°§C¡C

À˵ø¦U¾ðºØ¦b¼Ë°Ï¤ºªº¤À¥¬ª¬ªp¡A¥i°Ï¤À¬°¤U¦C¤§ªÅ¶¡¤À¥¬Ãþ«¬¡G

1.¸W¯á«¬¡G¦pªø§ÀÑÜ¡BÀ­«nÙÔ¡]Cycbalannopsis championii¡^¡B­ð§ùÃYµ¥¡C

2.¤s©Y«¬¡G¦p¤p¸­¾ð§û¡]Ardisia quinquegona¡^¡B¾U¯ß¤ìÁ¤¤lµ¥¡C

3.·Ë¨¦«¬¡G¦p¤ô¦P¤ì¡]Ficus fistulosa¡^¡B¥æ¤O©WÅK¦â¡]Drypetes karapinensis¡^µ¥¡C

4.¼s§G«¬¡G¦p¦¿¬Y¡B¶ø¤óªê¥Ö·£¡B´ä¤f¤ì²üµ¥¡C

«n¤¯¤s´ËªL¦b®|¯Åµ²ºc¤W¡AÅã¥Ü¨}¦nªº§ó·sª¬ºA¡A¸Ó´ËªL¦b²Õ¦¨¤Wµu´Á¤ºÀ³¯àºû«ùí©w¤£ÅÜ¡A¥i»¡¬O¥­¿ÅÆ[©À¤¤Ã­©wªº·¥¬Û´ËªL¡F¦ý´ËªLªL«a¯}¸H¡B¦s¦b¤£¤Ö¶§©Ê¾ðºØ¡A¦ü¥G¬O¤@­Ó¸g±`©Ê¤zÂZªºÀô¹Ò¡A¨äª[²§«×ªººû«ù¥ç¦³³¡¤À¨Ó¦Û©ó¤zÂZ¡C¥H¦¹Æ[ÂI¦ü¥G¤ä«ù«D¥­¿Å²z½×¡C¦b¼Ë°Ï¤¤¦PÄݪñ½tºØ¡A¤À¤Æ¥X¤£¦Pªº¤À§GÃþ«¬¡A¤ä«ù«¢´Ü»¹¹ï©ó¦]Ävª§¦Ó²£¥Í¤À¤Æªº¾Ç»¡¡C¦bªÅ¶¡¤À¥¬¤W¡A¾ðºØªº¤À¥¬»P¦a§Î¡BÀô¹Ò²§½è©Ê¦³Ãö¡AÅã¥ÜÀô¹Ò´£¨Ñ¤£¦P±ø¥ó¡A¥H¾A¦X¤£¦P´Óª«¥Íªø§ó·s¡AÀô¹Ò²§½è©Ê¨Ï±oºØ°Ï¹j¦Ó§K©óÄvª§¡A§e²{¥X¥Í¹Ò¤À¤Æ±¡ªp¡A¨Ï±o´ËªL¾ðºØ¦@¦s¡C

½Õ¬dµ²ªG»PÁµ¥¤H1992¦~©ó«n¤¯¤s°Ï¸U¨½±o¤s¤T¤½³¼ÆV¤¯¼Ë°Ï½Õ¬d¸ê®Æ¬Û¤ñ¸û¡A²Õ¦¨ºØÃþ¡Bµ²ºc¤Î¤À¥¬Ãþ«¬§¡¤Q¤À¬Û¦ü¡A»P¹ù¡]1995¡^¬°©ó«n¤¯¤s¦è¦V©Yªº¼Ë±a¬Û¤ñ¸û¡C«h©Y­±«¬»P²Ä¤T¸s¼Ë±a¤W¬q´Ó¸s¸û¬°¬Û¹³¡A»P·¨1994©ó«n¤¯¤s¦è°¼Á×­··Ë¨¦¤§2.1¤½³¼¼Ë°Ï¬Û¤ñºØÃþ²Õ¦¨¤j¤£¬Û¦P¡A¦¹Ãþ´ËªL¥i»¡¬O«n¤¯¤s°Ïªï­·©Y­±¨å«¬¤§´ËªL§Î¦¡¤§¤@¡C

Abstract


In 1995 a permanent 2-ha plot of lowland subtropical rain forest was established at Nanjen lake of the Nanjenshan Nature Reserve in southern Taiwan. All free-standing woody plants in the plot with dbh ³ 1cm were identified, measured, tagged, and mapped.

A total of 119 tree species (19005 stems), belonging to 43 families and 81 genera was recorded. The community structure was characterized by a relative dominance of Castanopsis carlesii in the canopy, Illicium arborescens in the subcanopy, and Psychotria rubra in the understory. The dominant families were Fagaceae, Illicaceae, Aquifoiaceae, Lauraceae and Theaceae. However, tropical species such as Moraceae were rare. Thus, floristic composition of this area was comparable with that found in some of the subtropical rain forests or even warm-temperate rain forests of the Central Range in Taiwan. The analysis of size-class distributions of individual species showed good recruitment patterns with rich saplings bank.

TWINSPAN analysis revealed four distinct groups of samples with the hilltop and northwest creek plant associations representing two opposite extremes of the gradient. The dominant families of the hilltop group were Fagaceae, Illicaceae, Theaceae, Aquifoiaceae, Lauraceae. But the dominant families of the creek group changed into Rubiaceae, Araliceae, Lauraceae, Fagaceae, and Staphyleaceae.

Based on distribution pattern of the species, most species were patchily distributed and many were random. Among the patchily-distributed species, Cyclobalanopsis championii, Rhododendron simsii only occurred on the hilltop, while Drypetes karapinensis and Ficus fistulosa occurred along the streamside. Illicium arborescens and Ilex cochinchinensis were commonly distributed on the intermediate slope. Species appeared to be randomly or near-randomly distributed over the plot included Scheffera octophylla and. Daphniphllum glaucescens ssp. oldhamii. The distribution patterns of species also suggested that there were strong niche differentiation among species.

It is found the community of Nanjenshan forest is organized by different topographic plant associations. The existence of different environmental factors that are related to topography of plot and different responses of species largely contribute to the maintenance of tree species diversity in the forests.

txback.gif (414 bytes)


¥»¯¸©Ò¦³¸ê®Æ§¡ÄÝ­ì§@ªÌ©Ò¦³¡A½Ð¤Å¥H¥ô¦ó§Î¦¡Âà¸ü¡B¤Þ¥Î¡C­Y¦³¨Ï¥Î¤Wªº»Ý¨D¡A½Ð»P­ì§@ªÌÁpµ¸¡C